When robots could have the above functionalities and begin to “live” together as a commonly needy large number, we ought to sensibly see them as robocall system amiable creatures. Friendly robots could shape network of robots. When robots could work as characterized above and shape a network they would never again need to live as captives of their human bosses. When that happens it would be the start of a history that robots could test people or begin their reason for assuming control people.
The following inquiry would be: Is the amiability characterized above sensible for robots?
Since not every one of the functionalities referenced above exist (in any event freely) in this present reality, to maintain a strategic distance from any superfluous contention, it is insightful to make our judgment dependent on whether any realized logical rule would be damaged in any viable endeavor to understand a specific usefulness among those referenced previously. Correspondence with different machines, moving articles, working and fixing machine frameworks, and investigating regular assets are all among these days normal practices with modified apparatuses. Along these lines, despite the fact that we probably won’t have a solitary robot or a gathering of single robots have every one of the functionalities referenced above, there is no key explanation behind any of the functionalities referenced above to be considered as not producible as indicated by any known logical standard, the main thing left to do is incorporate those functionalities together onto a solitary entire robot (and accordingly a gathering of single robots).
Since we don’t perceive any known logical rule that would keep any of those functionalities from being acknowledged, we ought to sensibly anticipate that that with cash should be contributed and with time to be spent the making of friendly robots as characterized before could predictably turn out to be genuine except if some uncommon endeavors to be made by people on this world to keep that from occurring.